First | Appointment of the Director of the National rug Center of Iran
Official narrative | What we read in the news
Mohammad Mehdi Farshchi Movahed appointed as the head of the National rug Center of Iran
In a decree issued by the Deputy Minister of Management Development, Resources and Provincial Affairs of the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Trade, Mr. Mohammad Mehdi Farshchi Movahed was appointed as the head of the National rug Center of Iran
Farshchi previously served as the head of the Hamadan Province Anti-Corruption Organization, the head of the National Tobacco Planning and Supervision Center, an advisor to the Deputy Minister and the head of the Trade Development Organization of Iran, a member of the regional board of directors of the State Trading Company of Iran, the deputy head of marketing and economic affairs of the National rug Center of Iran, and the deputy head of executive and monitoring of the ministerial area
Previously, Ms. Zahra Kamani was the head of the National rug Center of Iran
Image 1: From the IRIB news website
Field Narrative | What's Behind the News
When Changing Managers Doesn't Solve Problems
In a situation where persian handwoven rug are facing a series of challenges in the areas of production, raw material supply, marketing and sales, exports, and reduced market confidence, management changes alone have not been able to create serious hope for transformation in this area. The experience of the past years at the National rug Center of Iran has shown that simply moving managers, without a sustainable, coherent, and implementable plan, will not have a tangible impact on improving the situation in the handwoven rug sector
A review of the management process of the National rug Center of Iran in recent years also confirms this fact. Since the 2001, the management of this center has changed hands between various individuals; from Feyzollah Arab Sorkhi, Morteza Faraji, Faisal Mordasi, Mohammad Bagher Aghaalikhani, and Hamid Kargar (2014 to 2018) to Fereshteh Dastpak (2018 to 2019), Farahnaz Rafe (2019 to around 2022), and then periods of supervision and structural changes, to the management of Zahra Kamani (2025) and Mohammad Mehdi Farshchi (late 2026 to present). These successive changes have at times limited the opportunity to continue programs, evaluate performance, and bring projects to a conclusion
A significant portion of the managers and supervisors who were responsible for the center in previous years entered this field with concern and motivation; however, the short period of responsibilities and successive management changes did not provide sufficient opportunity for the completion of many of their programs, policies, and actions. On the other hand, a significant portion of the issues and challenges in the field of handwoven rug cannot be limited solely to the performance of the National rug Center; because the roots of some of the fundamental problems must be sought in the structures, decision-making methods, and even internal issues of the handwoven rug industry
What is felt more than anything else in the handwoven rug industry today is the need for a management that is concerned, persistent, and familiar with the realities of this field; a management that, beyond purely administrative structures, has a real understanding of the issues of producers, weavers, exporters, sellers, and market activists, and can simultaneously think about today's problems and future challenges. In such circumstances, it is expected that responsibilities will not be limited to a set of short-term and cross-sectional measures, and that decisions will be followed with a comprehensive, long-term perspective and continuous follow-up so that the output will be tangible and effective results for the handwoven rug industry
Of course, it is very important that improving the situation of handwoven rug, rather than depending on changing individuals, requires the formation of a sustainable, program-oriented approach with executive commitment; an approach that can lead this field from a cycle of repeating problems to stability and real prosperity. In the meantime, one of the important gaps is the lack of a clear mechanism for evaluating the performance of managers after the end of their term of office. Usually, with the end of each managerial term, changes occur without providing a clear report on past performance; without it being clear what programs have been achieved, what promises have been fulfilled, and what issues are still unresolved
While a careful review of the performance of previous managers can not only contribute to greater transparency and accountability, but also allows the new manager to follow the path of the future more realistically and effectively by recognizing the strengths and weaknesses of the past. Today's handwoven persian rug need more than name changes, continuity of programs, managerial responsibility, and a forward-looking perspective; a perspective that does not see each managerial period as a new starting point, but rather as the continuation of a path that must reach a clear and measurable result
Figure 2: The recurring cycle of displacements in organizations